<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Montag Law</title> <atom:link href="http://www.montaglaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.montaglaw.com</link> <description>Law Offices Of Jonathan D. Montag in San Diego, California</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 11:52:02 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Wouldn’t you like to be a parolee too?</title><link>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/05/13/wouldnt-you-like-to-be-a-parolee-too/</link> <comments>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/05/13/wouldnt-you-like-to-be-a-parolee-too/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 11:50:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jonathan D. Montag</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[212(a)(9)(B)]]></category> <category><![CDATA[3 and 10 year bars]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Adjustment of Status]]></category> <category><![CDATA[admission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[advance parole]]></category> <category><![CDATA[immediate relatives]]></category> <category><![CDATA[immigration lawyer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly]]></category> <category><![CDATA[parole in place]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PIP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quilantan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category> <category><![CDATA[waive in]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.montaglaw.com/?p=2531</guid> <description><![CDATA[The usual outcry from people concerned about “illegal aliens” in the United States benefitting from legislation such as a DREAM-like Act, amnesty, or comprehensive immigration reform is that those that benefit from such legislation will end up going to the head of the line to the detriment of those who played by the rules. The [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/05/13/wouldnt-you-like-to-be-a-parolee-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Ninth Circuit takes Oshodi v. Holder en banc</title><link>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/05/04/ninth-circuit-takes-oshodi-v-holder-en-banc/</link> <comments>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/05/04/ninth-circuit-takes-oshodi-v-holder-en-banc/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jonathan D. Montag</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Asylum]]></category> <category><![CDATA[corroboration]]></category> <category><![CDATA[en banc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Oshodi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[REAL ID]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.montaglaw.com/?p=2520</guid> <description><![CDATA[On January 29, 2012, I wrote about a Ninth Circuit decision, Oshodi v. Holder, decided by a three-judge panel consisting of Judges Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and  Robert E. Cowen (a senior circuit judge in the Third Circuit), and written by Judge Rawlinson. In the January 29, 2012, posting, I discussed and gave some analysis of the [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/05/04/ninth-circuit-takes-oshodi-v-holder-en-banc/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The BIA issues a decision that is one giant leap backwards in refugee and asylum law.</title><link>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/04/15/the-bia-issues-a-decision-that-is-one-giant-leap-backwards-in-refugee-and-asylum-law/</link> <comments>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/04/15/the-bia-issues-a-decision-that-is-one-giant-leap-backwards-in-refugee-and-asylum-law/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:34:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jonathan D. Montag</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[208]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Asylum]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kaganovich]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Matter of D-K-]]></category> <category><![CDATA[rescision]]></category> <category><![CDATA[withholding]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.montaglaw.com/?p=2360</guid> <description><![CDATA[A legal fiction underpinning administrative law, the Chevron Doctrine, is that federal agencies are best suited to interpreting federal statutes and thus agency decisions interpreting the laws they administer are afforded a great deal of deference. The doctrine, derived from Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, an environmental law case. The Chevron decision held that federal environmental [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/04/15/the-bia-issues-a-decision-that-is-one-giant-leap-backwards-in-refugee-and-asylum-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Visa waiver adjustment &#8211; No love in the City of Brotherly Love.</title><link>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/03/11/visa-waiver-adjustment-no-love-in-the-city-of-brotherly-love/</link> <comments>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/03/11/visa-waiver-adjustment-no-love-in-the-city-of-brotherly-love/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:33:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jonathan D. Montag</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[245(c)(4)]]></category> <category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bradley]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Immigration vera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[INA § 217]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Momeni]]></category> <category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category> <category><![CDATA[San Diego immigration attorney]]></category> <category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[visa waiver]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.montaglaw.com/?p=2344</guid> <description><![CDATA[Over the past few years I have been writing a lot  about the visa waiver program and adjustment of status. The visa waiver program is a program found at INA § 217 where citizens of certain countries can enter the United States for ninety days without a visa, similar to how United States citizens, when [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.montaglaw.com/2012/03/11/visa-waiver-adjustment-no-love-in-the-city-of-brotherly-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-18 02:58:21 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
