In the mid-2000′s, I was involved in a case, Tchoukhrova v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir. 2005), vacated and remanded by Gonzales v. Tchoukhrova, 549 U.S. 801, 127 S. Ct. 57, 166 L. Ed. 2d 7 (October 2, 2006). The case stood for three propositions. The first was a relatively unexciting issue for the general public regarding judicial review of an administrative decision. The court held that when the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) adopts the decision of the immigration judge, the court of appeals can review the decision in its entirety and not just the portions specifically addressed by the BIA. Mindful of its low excitement level, I will simply add that this is important because the Supreme Court has instructed the courts of appeal that before th courts of appeal rule on an issue, the BIA must first rule on it. When the BIA adopts the underlying decision and the immigration judge was comprehensive in the decision, the Court of Appeals believes it is then free to review all aspects of the decision instead of sending some aspects back to the BIA for its analysis. See, it is unexciting.
(more…)